Open jmhobbs opened 1 year ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | ffafdd0dae7d14f9364db9940d0fd301811a4985 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/grand-bunny-8f4598/deploys/63522345d655270009dd1d53 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-36--grand-bunny-8f4598.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
Base: 98.55% // Head: 96.74% // Decreases project coverage by -1.81%
:warning:
Coverage data is based on head (
ffafdd0
) compared to base (1f7883e
). Patch coverage: 64.51% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
I think I prefer to move parsing and initialization outside of the core. My thought is to publish scoped packages like @jstodotxt/hidden-extension
and opt in that way.
With the rewrite, I'm looking to support #10.
This is roughly the proposed API. Due to the check and cast when using, I'm uncertain this is any better than having users manage extensions outside of the core.
Example Usage