Here is a workflow to leverage the Wikipedia change log firehose as input to the collaborative review system:
Set up a stream reader for the Wikipedia change log events stream
Filter the stream for substantive content changes (ignore minor edits)
For each change event:
Extract the new page content
Pass page content to an NLP model to generate a summary, identifying key changes
Create a new review object including original and edited page content
Route review objects based on page categories:
Send science pages to the science review workflow
History pages to the history review workflow
And so on for each domain
In each review workflow:
Muse 1 provides an initial review of the changes
Muse 2 analyzes and reflects on Muse 1's review
Muse 3 expands and synthesizes insights from both
A group review synthesizes all insights into a final version
Publish final reviewed versions of page changes to a monitored output stream
Iterate on review workflows based on feedback
This leverages the constant stream of Wikipedia changes as input content to keep your collaborative review workflows running continuously with new data to process. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional requirements!
Here is a workflow to leverage the Wikipedia change log firehose as input to the collaborative review system:
Set up a stream reader for the Wikipedia change log events stream
Filter the stream for substantive content changes (ignore minor edits)
For each change event:
Extract the new page content
Pass page content to an NLP model to generate a summary, identifying key changes
Create a new review object including original and edited page content
Send science pages to the science review workflow
History pages to the history review workflow
And so on for each domain
Muse 1 provides an initial review of the changes
Muse 2 analyzes and reflects on Muse 1's review
Muse 3 expands and synthesizes insights from both
A group review synthesizes all insights into a final version
Publish final reviewed versions of page changes to a monitored output stream
Iterate on review workflows based on feedback
This leverages the constant stream of Wikipedia changes as input content to keep your collaborative review workflows running continuously with new data to process. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional requirements!