Closed jennyzu closed 5 years ago
Hi,
Thank you for the code. Can you please elaborate on what are your changes compared to the original article? I didn't understand the explanation in the README. I am trying to understand what to change in the code, if I want the same implementation as in the paper.
I think the change of the implementation is the first layer, the paper is sub_mean of the div2k data set, and the upsampler layer is changed, in the paper, first pixshuffler then conv, here is first conv, then shuffler. but when I change the code into the orignal paper setting. The network can't converge. I think it's a little weird here. Do you have other implementations?
No, this is the only implementation I found. That's why it's important for me to understand the difference and understand why the difference exists.
Hey, here's a link to an implementation by the original author: https://github.com/LimBee/NTIRE201
Hi,
Thank you for the code. Can you please elaborate on what are your changes compared to the original article? I didn't understand the explanation in the README. I am trying to understand what to change in the code, if I want the same implementation as in the paper.