issues
search
jnk0le
/
Ring-Buffer
simple C++11 ring buffer implementation, allocated and evaluated at compile time
MIT License
380
stars
64
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Max size of head/tail
#25
ongkoonhan
opened
1 month ago
1
Please include type_traits for std::is_trivial for older gcc
#24
toge
closed
6 months ago
2
add support for non trivial objects
#23
jnk0le
opened
1 year ago
9
警告 C26495
#22
wfs20
opened
1 year ago
4
Add find function
#21
dzywater
opened
2 years ago
1
Does this ringbuffer thread safe?
#20
xin-w8023
closed
2 years ago
2
Implement iterator
#19
aaarne
opened
3 years ago
0
Add way to remove arbitrary element
#18
dsandber
opened
3 years ago
1
How to use for multi-consumer multi-producer
#17
dsandber
opened
3 years ago
1
Multiple producers, a single consumer situation will produce a crash
#16
XMatrixXiang
closed
3 years ago
1
alignas(0) causes gcc warnings
#15
jnk0le
opened
3 years ago
0
Feature/socketio
#14
ponast
opened
3 years ago
0
Cross Compatible Windows Error fix
#13
swithers19
closed
3 years ago
1
unncessary void in parameter list
#12
jrahlf
closed
2 years ago
1
const consumerClear producerClear compile errors
#11
mgood7123
closed
3 years ago
1
Generalize ring buffer, differentiate between atomic ring buffer non-atomic ring buffer
#10
jrahlf
opened
3 years ago
1
Add template parameter to make it a overwriting ring buffer
#9
jrahlf
opened
3 years ago
1
peek() is not right
#8
luxl
closed
5 years ago
0
As in the description, this is for embedded targents, can I use it for x86 PC?
#7
luxl
opened
5 years ago
1
fixed a compiling error of max() on Windows7 Visual Studio 2015
#6
zhengfish
closed
3 years ago
3
There is a compiling error in Visual Studio 2015 on Windows 7
#5
zhengfish
closed
5 years ago
1
"no wasted slots" is only true if you need power of 2 size
#4
mratsim
closed
5 years ago
0
readBuff(T*, size_t) never actually reads
#3
zysoft
closed
5 years ago
1
sometimes stuck on isempty function and cache padding
#2
69736c616d
closed
5 years ago
11
isnt std::atomic_thread_fence more appropriate ?
#1
69736c616d
closed
6 years ago
1