Closed explorigin closed 3 years ago
The docker tag of LATEST seems to be it's own image rather than pointing to a distinct version.
Correct.
... non-latest image (2.0.0) is a reasonable alternative when LATEST breaks.
If you need to use it in production, ALWAYS use a numbered release. NEVER use latest
.
latest
is built off of the "latest" commit in the master
branch. While I take best efforts to ensure it should be working before pushing it, no developer is going to guarantee that.
The docker tag of
LATEST
seems to be it's own image rather than pointing to a distinct version. Doing it this way makes me wonder if the most recent, non-latest image (2.0.0) is a reasonable alternative when LATEST breaks.As of March 31, defining
jnovack/autossh
yields this on my RPi4 (image hash: sha256:51114f14d3f42a0142f5056d73ac92bb97a4a6ed5d2e9ad8221c15d190b4fce9):Yet
jnovack/autossh:2.0.0
works as expected (image hash: sha256:8517e3b5f377fba6cbb81248285409ac588459f341acee3e2a78d65dda39ba81):Really this issue is less about the breakage in LATEST and more about the broken image versioning.