Closed parkr closed 4 years ago
Nope, no need to ship tests. Rubygems hasn't supported executing them for ages and I think there's a general pattern of removing them from built gems. You up for a PR?
Well, it looks like I was beaten to it – in 2018! Crack v0.4.3 (pictured above) included the test data, but v0.4.4 (which I just upgraded to), does not.
Thank you for the quick reply, @bf4, and for being cool with the proposal. Sorry for not checking on the latest version! 🤦
Lol
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020, 8:25 AM Parker Moore notifications@github.com wrote:
Well, it looks like I was beaten to it – in 2018! https://github.com/jnunemaker/crack/pull/61 Crack v0.4.3 (pictured above) included the test data, but v0.4.4 (which I just upgraded to), does not.
Thank you for the quick reply, @bf4 https://github.com/bf4, and for being cool with the proposal. Sorry for not checking on the latest version! 🤦
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jnunemaker/crack/issues/65#issuecomment-719550469, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABC4QWNOZVLHL6U2L3BFBDSNK5EZANCNFSM4TEFZ4JQ .
Hey folks,
I noticed that this gem is 2.6 MB, 2.5 of which comes from
test/data/large_dataset.json
. Is it necessary to ship the test data with this gem? Perhaps we could get away with just:lib/
crack.gemspec
History
LICENSE
README.md
What do you think? /cc @bf4