Open some-mthfka opened 4 years ago
grigorievich notifications@github.com writes:
The indentation seems to work though.
Yes, because of the constant communication between SLY and Slynk about
which things are macros and their argists. The
slynk-indentation-cache-thread
takes care of this.
What could this be?
Calls to user-defined macros and functions are only highlighted if they
start with with-
, define-
, and check-
. Contrary to indentation,
the font-locking system does not take note of the nature of the
function.
João
Calls to user-defined macros and functions are only highlighted if they start with
with-
,define-
, andcheck-
.
So, wait, is this an established convention / intended choice then or simply a feature not yet implemented? If the latter, please, consider this issue a feature request.
PS I guess I am fine w/ function names not getting highlighted (just as they're not in elisp), but that the macro calls are all greyed out is a tad disheartening : )
So, wait, is this an established convention / intended choice then or simply a feature not yet implemented?
It's both.
If the latter, please, consider this issue a feature request.
OK.
I see, alright!
Hi!
sly-eval-defun
on both of these:Insert
(aa
or(ma
and neither of these are highlighted as a function or macro name. The builtin macros and functions are highlighted just fine.
The indentation seems to work though.
What could this be?
Emacs 26.3 SLY 1.0.0-beta-3