Closed michaeldelago closed 3 months ago
This would be super useful. Any plans to merge @joaotavora?
Sorry, this flew completely under the radar. I see nothing wrong with it, it's self-contained. But I haven't used snooze in a long time and can't test it. Just reword the commit message according to how the other ones are worded and I'll press the merge button.
I ran into this issue since clack usually binds the request and response to a var.
I've tested that this change works!
Thanks for your swift response.
cc @michaeldelago
I can change the commit message myself. Just to busy right now to investigate what it should say.
On Fri, May 31, 2024, 12:25 boogs @.***> wrote:
cc @michaeldelago https://github.com/michaeldelago
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/joaotavora/snooze/pull/36#issuecomment-2141827922, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC6PQ276M4YMJ32INLJ3WTZFBMZTAVCNFSM6AAAAAA65T5GBWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBRHAZDOOJSGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
bump @joaotavora
This pull request makes it so users can add response headers to clack apps
The documented
redirect-to
function looks like below:If you're using hunchentoot, this is fine, but if you're using clack with something other than hunchentoot (such as woo) it doesn't work since hunchentoot isn't being used
This allows the
redirect-to
function to look like this: