Closed olibre closed 6 years ago
This has my vote as well. Personally, I'd prefer the MIT license to GLP as it is more permissive.
It seems that the code cannot be legally used by others without a license, we're only allowed to read it. This covers the issue in some detail: http://www.infoworld.com/article/2615869/open-source-software/github-needs-to-take-open-source-seriously.html
Which is too bad, because this code is really useful.
Licence has been added 😀
https://github.com/joboccara/NamedType/blob/master/LICENSE
I think you forgot to input your name & date :)
The license now has a name and date, so I'm closing the issue if it's ok with you.
Provide a different license for your code source and documentation. Your code source could be licensed using MIT or GPL, and your documentation using CC-BY-SA.
Thanks for your talk at C++FRUG Paris ;)