Closed jtbuch closed 6 years ago
This checks out.
It seems that the discrepancy was due to matching with RAVE after putting the selection function cuts on tgas.
Thanks, Jatan
That makes sense, that would remove about 50% of the match, because the selection function only covers about 50% of the sky.
Hi Jo,
I tried to obtain the stars common to RAVE and TGAS using:
gaia_tools.xmatch.xmatch()
, andtemp_indx= np.where(np.isnan(rave_cat['parallax_TGAS'])==False)[0] \ _, tgas_indx= np.unique(rave_cat['parallax_TGAS'][temp_indx], return_index=True)
where
len(temp_indx)= 249,603
and matches the value that RAVE claims here: https://www.rave-survey.org/project/ andlen(tgas_indx)=210,368
is the number of unique stars that should roughly match the value I obtain from 1.However, there's only 118329 stars in common after using
gaia_tools.xmatch.xmatch()
.I went through your source code and it had no obvious bugs. Any idea why there would be such a discrepancy?
Best, Jatan