Closed andycasey closed 9 years ago
Hi Andy,
The Vlos
input is the heliocentric line-of-sight velocity. I dislike using 'radial velocity' or Vrad
for this, as I always confuse that with the Galactocentric radial velocity, but you're right that Vhel
would probably be a better name. I've clarified the documentation.
Thanks,
Jo
Hi Jo,
I thought that might be the reason why you had named it Vlos
. Thanks for clarifying that.
Cheers
Hi Jo,
I've opened this issue to resolve a discussion regarding
Vlos
when initialising agalpy.orbit.Orbit
. It's a simple question, but I'd like to be sure. It's arisen because the termsV_los
,V_rad
,V_hel
are frequently (and incorrectly) used interchangeably by some people, myself included.When you refer to
Vlos
as the line-of-sight velocity in the documentation, do you mean the velocity observed from the telescope on some night of observation (what I usually call the line-of-sight velocity), or do you mean the observed velocity after accounting for the motion of the Earth (e.g., the heliocentric velocity)?I would assume
Vlos
is actually the latter becausegalpy
has no knowledge of where the object was observed from or when. Otherwise theVlos
would vary by up to +/- 30 km/s and the inferred orbit would be slightly different depending on which nights' observations were used.Is my assumption correct or have I missed something here?
Thanks, Andy