Hi, jocicmarko, glad to read your code. I remember you ever resized the image to 64 80, but now the image is resized to 9696 in your code. Could you please tell us why do you change the size of the input image? Does the later size work better?
And the size of the original image is 420 * 580, which the height isn't equal to the weight. This time you make img_rows equal to img_cols. Is there sepcial reason making you change this? Will it lose too much information though there is noise existing?
Hoping to get your reply. Thank you very much!
Hi, jocicmarko, glad to read your code. I remember you ever resized the image to 64 80, but now the image is resized to 9696 in your code. Could you please tell us why do you change the size of the input image? Does the later size work better? And the size of the original image is 420 * 580, which the height isn't equal to the weight. This time you make
img_rowsequal toimg_cols. Is there sepcial reason making you change this? Will it lose too much information though there is noise existing? Hoping to get your reply. Thank you very much!