Closed spuder closed 6 years ago
Hi, I believe you're thinking about nodes, not pool members. Pool members always have a port specified as part of their name. This allows for the same node to service different pools on different ports. But that aside, you're right - Remove-PoolMember should probably throw a 'member not found' error when you try to remove a pool member that it can't locate.
Yes. That was the mistake. A warning 'member $member not found' would be helpful.
Ok, pull request made. Please review when you get a chance. Thanks.
Pull request merged. Closing this issue.
I couldn't get Remove-PoolMember to work. It was not returning any errors, but wasn't removing the member.
It would be good to document that the 'Name' attribute requires that the port be part of the name
wrong
correct