Open joelansbro opened 2 years ago
I've added a python package that parses some arguments from given sentences, from an academic source. It's a good basis to begin off of. See notes section for further details.
Main thing - can we gives weight to the argument categories to define what a good argument is? If so, can we add this into the weighting of what defines a good article?
Created a prototype testing out Argument Mining, the next step will be to run a few of the articles over the argument mining in order to get a feel for how good the argument mining has gone, Get a feel for how well the argument mining scores have captured a blog's points, and present the numbers. ending with a summary of findings (can be rough notes) that will be able to lead into explaining in the project.
Argumentation Mining is the NLP method of exploring and mapping the arguments presented in a piece of text. This method could be useful in generating a map of an argument that an article makes, providing some useful insight when researching the blogs.
I should use the existing datasets inside the NLP-methods repo to test out the argumentation mining, look up previous examples of argumentation mining and see if I can replicate something that looks half decent.
Some things to read:
Five Years of Argument Mining: A Data-Driven Analysis 2018 Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata Argument Mining: A Survey 2020 Lawrence, Reed Argumentation Mining State of the Art and Emerging Trends 2016 Marco Lippi, Paolo Torroni
Give this a go: https://towardsdatascience.com/cross-topic-argument-mining-learning-how-to-classify-texts-1d9e5c00c4cc