Open jimothyGator opened 11 years ago
I'm not so sure hat we want to require using Puma here. And this will also conflict with the use of Thin in the development
bundle group. Lets use one or the other.
Can you also rebase these commits into one please? thx
Okay, I can switch it over to run with Thin, and rebase to a single commit.
I picked Puma primarily because I cribbed this setup from Gitlab, which switched from Unicorn to Puma to reduce memory footprint (and the reduction is significant), but honestly, I hadn't compared it to Thin.
I'm happy to use either, but lets stick with one.
Joel Moss
Call me +44 7791 503309 http://twitter.com/joelmoss AIM: joelkmoss Skype: joelmoss.info (http://joelmoss.info)
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 at 04:38, Jim Cushing wrote:
Okay, I can switch it over to run with Thin, and rebase to a single commit. I picked Puma primarily because I cribbed this setup from Gitlab, which switched from Unicorn to Puma to reduce memory footprint (and the reduction is significant), but honestly, I hadn't compared it to Thin.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/joelmoss/strano/pull/49#issuecomment-18520487).
Sorry for the wait; it's been a busy week. I'll get this cleaned up this weekend.
I've written more detail installation instructions. I am going to do some clean up, re-test these with a fresh Debian install, and then I will re-base as a single commit.
This adds the following:
This is based on the instructions for running Gitlab and has been tested on Ubuntu.