Closed joelostblom closed 2 months ago
Storytelling with Data by Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic teaches by chart type, but also has a strong section on reducing visual clutter. Here are some features of this book: Use of bad examples. Starts with an obviously terrible visualization. Reminds me of the examples of bad visualizations you showed in 531- these are quite memorable. Sequential improvement of data visualizations. Each iteration illustrates the impact of a change. Instructive tone: it says things like “Here are 10 steps you can take to reduce visual clutter” rather than “A variety of types of visual clutter should be avoided.” This feels more actionable to me but there is a clear trade-off between this approach and being too prescriptive. Classification: Chart type, Sequential
Good Charts by Scott Berinato This one surprised me. It’s almost written stream of consciousness and reads like an amusing self help guide. The fascinating part is that it’s really focussed on how to think about data visualization. It’s very conceptual. It uses a series of case-studies and employs that sequential improvement trick throughout. It has a cool section on deceptive charts. I find the storytelling narrative style quite captivating. Classification: Sequential, Narrative-driven, Use of invented conceptual frameworks
Data Visualization in Society by Martin Engebretsen and Helen Kennedy It’s essentially a collection of case-studies written by academics and cobbled together as chapters. The approach is highly conceptual and does not aim to teach the practicalities of data visualization, but rather the scientific theories surrounding it. Chapter 6 was quite interesting as it discusses exactly how visualizations can be used deceptively. Overall, this book seems to written in a style we do not want to emulate. Classification: Academic, case-studies, theoretical
Data Sketches A Journey of Imagination, Exploration, and Beautiful Data Visualizations (Nadieh Bremer Shirley Wu) This one is very design focussed but also contains a lot of code. The emphasis is on making elaborate custom visualizations in D3. Instead of teaching data visualization by chart type or structuring things by concept, the book is a collection of examples of work, where they deconstruct exactly how it was made and why they made those decisions. I think there is something cool about demystifying the process – but this book does not challenge the reader or encourage them to participate in some way. There are also no overarching themes or commentary that tie everything together. Classification: Graphics focussed
Data-Driven Storytelling (AK Peters Visualization Series) This book is structured as a series of case studies. Again, it may be more useful for the content rather than structure. It has an excellent section on Exploration vs Explanation in data visualization. This includes many of the visualizations you showed in 531, such as Iraq’s Bloody Toll and Napolean’s Map. Part of this makes me wonder is a useful structure for a book is different chapter based on the purpose (exploration vs explanation and further subcategories). The other book Good Charts defines this as two axis: Exploratory to Declarative and Conceptual to Data-Driven. This may be too simplistic but I could imagine an entire book structured by subcategories of what you actually aim to achieve with the visualization.
How Charts Lie by Alberto Cairo This book effectively employs the sequential improvement narrative. It starts with misleading charts and then improves them. Its chapters are structured by the different types of misleading charts (poor design, dubious data, insufficient data, confusing uncertainty, misleading patterns). I think that there is a bit of a lack of real structure in this book though. It seems to be through example after example like “here’s another one.” Again, it's hard to remember the lessons it is teaching as they are structured as a continuous monologue rather than a clear framework. Classification: Sequential improvement, personal narrative
Show Me the Numbers (Stephen Few) This one is quite technical. It generally follows the chart type paradigm but has sections divided by the specific features of a chart e.g, axis. It seems a bit reductionist. One thing it does well is explicitly challenge the reader to solve problems. But it makes me wonder: do readers actually pause and try and work things out themselves? Are there ways to create slightly more resistance so the reader doesn’t just skip to the next paragraph to get the solution? Classification: By Chart, by chart feature, problem solving
Imagine you've been tasked with creating a visualization from a complex dataset to inform major policy decisions. As you begin, you encounter questions that challenge your approach:
These questions highlight a fundamental truth about data visualization: it's a field defined by tensions. Every decision we make as we craft a visualization involves carefully balancing competing needs and priorities.
This course is designed to explore these tensions and equip students with the critical thinking skills needed to navigate them effectively. We'll focus on three core tensions that underlie virtually every visualization decision:
Context vs Focus
Innovation vs Convention
Accessibility vs Interactivity
Finding Focus: Reducing Clutter and Creating Hierarchy
Crafting a Focused Narrative
Keeping Context in the Picture
Embracing Context: Exploratory Data Visualization
Why Conventions Matter
Breaking the Right Rules
Responsible Innovation
Accessibility by Design
The Promise and Pitfalls of Interactivity
Here are the main resources I am aware of on the top of my head. I made an initial grouping of how I think of these in my head, but by all means feel free to create your own labels/groups that you think makes more sense. I have elaborated quite a bit and tried to also identify what I like in particular in some of these resources, just to highlight for you where my mind is at. After writing these down my sense is that we will follow some combination of strategies to allow for things like natural progression, engaging narratives, and structured material to co-exist; exciting =)