joethei / obsidian-rss

Read RSS Feeds from inside Obsidian
GNU General Public License v3.0
394 stars 23 forks source link

[Idea] {{highlights}} with blockref using Carry-Forward Plugin Engine #82

Closed FelipeRearden closed 2 years ago

FelipeRearden commented 2 years ago

Hello @joethei !!!!1

This idea is related to an expansion of the amazing features of RSS Reader -> Highlight in Reading View and the {{highlights}}

1- Add blockref to each line that has highlighted content ^blockid; 2- when using the {{highlight}} variable, add the [[backlink]] syntax to connect [[filename#^blockref]] to the ==highlight== content

There is a plugin Called Carry-Forward that do exactly this: one of the commands sends to clipboard this syntax {{selection}}[[filename#^blockref|alias]] where:

BUT the most important thing is that Carry-Forward supports MULTIPLE CURSORS. Take a look at the images below:

0 1 2 3

I know this plugin and its features very well because I'm the one who request support for multiple cursors and who did the tests of this version.

My FR: Integration with RSS Reader

My idea is to integrate RSS Reader with Carry-Forward to make possible to have {{highlights}} with backlinks.

If the user have Carry-Forward installed/toggle=ON then the {{highlights}} will be created with backlinks and blockref in the lines with ==highlights==

I have no idea if my idea is feasible :( I'm assuming that you copy the content of ==highlight== to insert inside {{highlights}} maybe this copy method could use Carry-Forward engine if the vault has Carry-Forward installed.


Let me know what you think :)

This idea have some relation with #65

Have a great day!

joethei commented 2 years ago

This is a hard one because the Carry-Forward plugin uses some editor only functionality that I cannot use for this purpose.

Since the end result is similar to #65 I am closing this issue.

FelipeRearden commented 2 years ago

This is a hard one because the Carry-Forward plugin uses some editor only functionality that I cannot use for this purpose.

Thanks for trying @joethei . I was trying to make things easier:)

Since the end result is similar to #65 I am closing this issue.

100% agree

Have a great day!!!