Closed tuurma closed 7 years ago
I can confirm that gsh/collection.xconf
is not installed anywhere and thus it (or better, replication.xconf
, as you suggest) should be deleted, although the other .xconf files that do have corresponding directories beneath gsh/data
are successfully installed. (I believe @zwobit was the one who did the pass through all the hsg apps, ensuring replication was active on all .xconf files and adding replication.xconf
to the root level of apps that otherwise didn't have collection.xconf
files affecting the root level.)
there are 2 configuration files present in gsh repo
collection.xconf
andreplication.xconf
as per https://github.com/joewiz/gsh/blob/master/pre-install.xql#L34 only
replication.xconf
is copied to/db/system/config
and therefore range index configuration fromcollection.xconf
is currently ineffective.Happy to merge them but I wonder what should be our naming policy here? I'd personally follow eXist-db recommended naming and have collection.xconf stay and say goodbye to replication.xconf. What do you think @joewiz?