Closed barbara1 closed 9 years ago
I have no idea why my comment line changed to an enormous font size :), sorry about that. its rather distracting.
The phyloseq data classes did not change during this time. There is an updated release version of phyloseq from Bioconductor that should work fine on your data. Try again, and/or let me know if you already resolved this issue.
Unfortunately for data import issues it is difficult to debug because I don't have access to your data. In the future, if you're having a data import issue, you will probably get a faster response if you can also share the files somewhere so that someone can reproduce (or not) your error.
I'm not aware of any problems with phyloseq import functions at the moment, other than biom-format version 2 not yet being supported, but that should change very soon.
I will close for now, but please feel free to post again to state if/how you resolved this problem.
Cheers
joey
Hi Joey, I started using phyloseq last November and am so glad to have the package for managing my microbial sequence data. Recently when I downloaded another package with various dependencies, I was asked if I also wanted to update my version of phyloseq. And I did. Then a few weeks later I went back to continue with some analyses in phyloseq only to find that all my phlyoseq objects would not read and always returned this error:
Error in phyloseq(DT_litter) : Problem with OTU/taxa indices among those you provided. Check using intersect() and taxa_names()
I though perhaps it had something to do with the update so I went back to my .csv files to recreate the object, but had the same error. I looked at the tax_names between the tables and everything looked fine. These were the same files I used for my original build of a phyloseq object in Nov-Dec. I decided to return to a small test set and run everything again (again a test set I created for learning phyloseq import before christmas). Still the same result. I must be missing something – or incorrectly assigning rownames/colnames --or have some other setting/dependencies/package that is causing some type of conflict? Below I have pasted the contents of the console for the test files – ending with the sessionInfo() . Hopefully it is something simple that I am just overlooking. Unfortunately I do not know what original phyloseq version I installed but I would have installed it sometime in November. Please let me know if there is any other information I can provide to help in solving the issues. I am running R in RStudio Ver. 0.98.1091
Thanks in advance!
Barbara
Console output creation of phyloseq object:
locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_Canada.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_Canada.1252 LC_MONETARY=English_Canada.1252 [4] LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=English_Canada.1252
attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages: [1] ggplot2_1.0.0 plyr_1.8.1 vegan_2.2-1 permute_0.8-3 lattice_0.20-29 phyloseq_1.10.0
loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] acepack_1.3-3.3 ade4_1.6-2 annotate_1.44.0 AnnotationDbi_1.28.1
[5] ape_3.2 base64enc_0.1-2 BatchJobs_1.5 BBmisc_1.8
[9] Biobase_2.26.0 BiocGenerics_0.12.1 BiocParallel_1.0.0 biom_0.3.12
[13] Biostrings_2.34.1 brew_1.0-6 checkmate_1.5.1 chron_2.3-45
[17] cluster_1.15.3 codetools_0.2-9 colorspace_1.2-4 data.table_1.9.4
[21] DBI_0.3.1 DESeq2_1.6.3 digest_0.6.8 fail_1.2
[25] foreach_1.4.2 foreign_0.8-61 Formula_1.1-2 genefilter_1.48.1
[29] geneplotter_1.44.0 GenomeInfoDb_1.2.4 GenomicRanges_1.18.4 grid_3.1.2
[33] gtable_0.1.2 Hmisc_3.14-6 igraph_0.7.1 IRanges_2.0.1
[37] iterators_1.0.7 latticeExtra_0.6-26 locfit_1.5-9.1 MASS_7.3-35
[41] Matrix_1.1-4 mgcv_1.8-3 multtest_2.22.0 munsell_0.4.2
[45] nlme_3.1-118 nnet_7.3-8 parallel_3.1.2 proto_0.3-10
[49] RColorBrewer_1.1-2 Rcpp_0.11.3 RcppArmadillo_0.4.600.0 reshape2_1.4.1
[53] RJSONIO_1.3-0 rpart_4.1-8 RSQLite_1.0.0 S4Vectors_0.4.0
[57] scales_0.2.4 sendmailR_1.2-1 splines_3.1.2 stats4_3.1.2
[61] stringr_0.6.2 survival_2.37-7 tools_3.1.2 XML_3.98-1.1
[65] xtable_1.7-4 XVector_0.6.0 zlibbioc_1.12.0