Closed johanley closed 2 weeks ago
From the idea of an equivalent boost+rotation, the result must be one-lobed.
But in my mind's eye, I see two lobes. The second boost starts from a non-isotropic starting point.
Could it be a single, asymmetric lobe? But that too seems to contradict the idea of an equivalent boost+rotation.
What's going on here?
My best guess at present: it's one-lobed, but the axis of symmetry is not in the direction of travel.
Here's a calc showing one lobe.
It would be nice to have an animation of this.
From the idea of an equivalent boost+rotation, the result must be one-lobed.
But in my mind's eye, I see two lobes. The second boost starts from a non-isotropic starting point.
Could it be a single, asymmetric lobe? But that too seems to contradict the idea of an equivalent boost+rotation.
What's going on here?
My best guess at present: it's one-lobed, but the axis of symmetry is not in the direction of travel.