Generally, when you have buchhaltung added an offsetting transaction to an imported one, it will no longer be suggested in a subsequent run of buchhaltung add. However, this seems to break down when you change the title of the offsetting transaction (using the t command during add).
How is buchhaltung supposed to match offsetting transactions to the corresponding imported one? Is the title used for this?
From a quick reading of the code, the "status" (cleared/unmarked) of transactions is used when deciding which ones to suggest for add. Is add supposed to add a "cleared" flag (*) to the imported transaction when it creates a corresponding offsetting one? Apparently it doesn't do that at the moment.
Generally, when you have
buchhaltung added an offsetting transaction to an imported one, it will no longer be suggested in a subsequent run ofbuchhaltung add. However, this seems to break down when you change the title of the offsetting transaction (using thetcommand duringadd).How is buchhaltung supposed to match offsetting transactions to the corresponding imported one? Is the title used for this?
From a quick reading of the code, the "status" (cleared/unmarked) of transactions is used when deciding which ones to suggest for
add. Isaddsupposed to add a "cleared" flag (*) to the imported transaction when it creates a corresponding offsetting one? Apparently it doesn't do that at the moment.