Criteria 1: Presentation: Are all required slides present?
Score Level: 4 (Exceeds expectations)
Comment(s): Great job, all of the requirements are met in the analysis document. It would be even better if your report was in the style of a powerpoint presentation instead of a paper with a lot of text. It's best to use bullet points instead of paragraphs of text.
Criteria 2: Code Accuracy: Does the Python code do what it is supposed to?
Score Level: 4 (Exceeds expectations)
Comment(s): Good, all of your code accurately retrieved the data intended.
Criteria 3: Understanding hypothesis testing and interpreting the p-value
Score Level: 3 (Meets expectations)
Comment(s): You're on the right track, but it would be even better if you made your hypotheses more explicit. Also, p-values do not need to be converted to a percent (e.g., say p-value of 0.05 instead of p-value of 5%).
Criteria 4: Ability to interpret the Objective & Outcome of the analysis in context
Score Level: 4 (Exceeds expectations)
Comment(s): Nice job, both objective and Recommendation / conclusion sections meet the requirements.
Rubric Score
Criteria 1: Presentation: Are all required slides present?
Criteria 2: Code Accuracy: Does the Python code do what it is supposed to?
Criteria 3: Understanding hypothesis testing and interpreting the p-value
Criteria 4: Ability to interpret the Objective & Outcome of the analysis in context
Comment(s): Nice job, both objective and Recommendation / conclusion sections meet the requirements.
Overall Score: 15/16
Good work!