Hi,
I'm using the standard options:
EBUSD_OPTS="--scanconfig -d ens:/dev/ttyACM0"
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ ebusctl i
version: ebusd 23.2.23.2
update check: invalid request
device: /dev/ttyACM0, enhanced high speed, firmware 1.1[3612].1[3612]
signal: acquired
symbol rate: 50
max symbol rate: 78
min arbitration micros: 16
max arbitration micros: 24
min symbol latency: 4
max symbol latency: 8
scan: finished
reconnects: 0
masters: 6
messages: 16
conditional: 0
poll: 0
update: 4
address 03: master #11
address 08: slave #11, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= 3B ;SW=" error: ERR: argument value out of valid range
address 10: master #2
address 15: slave #2, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0204;HW=-"
address 30: master #3
address 31: master #8, ebusd
address 35: slave #3, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0204;HW=-"
address 36: slave #8, ebusd
address 71: master #9
address 76: slave #9, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0227;HW=-"
address f1: master #10
address f6: slave #10, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0204;HW=-"
To me it seems, that data is received but it can't be interpreted. Sorry if it's a stupid question, but did I miss something in the configuration?
Thanks
Thilo
not a firmware issue, but anyway: the scan result of Kromschroeder devices is known to not be spec compliant. but this does not lead to other errors or wrong behaviour anyway
Hi, I'm using the standard options: EBUSD_OPTS="--scanconfig -d ens:/dev/ttyACM0"
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ ebusctl i version: ebusd 23.2.23.2 update check: invalid request device: /dev/ttyACM0, enhanced high speed, firmware 1.1[3612].1[3612] signal: acquired symbol rate: 50 max symbol rate: 78 min arbitration micros: 16 max arbitration micros: 24 min symbol latency: 4 max symbol latency: 8 scan: finished reconnects: 0 masters: 6 messages: 16 conditional: 0 poll: 0 update: 4 address 03: master #11 address 08: slave #11, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= 3B ;SW=" error: ERR: argument value out of valid range address 10: master #2 address 15: slave #2, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0204;HW=-" address 30: master #3 address 31: master #8, ebusd address 35: slave #3, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0204;HW=-" address 36: slave #8, ebusd address 71: master #9 address 76: slave #9, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0227;HW=-" address f1: master #10 address f6: slave #10, scanned "MF=Kromschroeder;ID= ;SW=0204;HW=-"
To me it seems, that data is received but it can't be interpreted. Sorry if it's a stupid question, but did I miss something in the configuration? Thanks Thilo