Add Modernizr to the AJAX Libraries API

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Modernizr (http://www.modernizr.com/) is a library to detect CSS 3 features and 
enables styling of 
HTML 5 elements in older browsers.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by www.bansa@googlemail.com on 25 Aug 2009 at 9:43

[GoogleCodeExporter]

please do!

Original comment by rob.mira...@gmail.com on 15 Jun 2010 at 2:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

yes pls!

Original comment by staticr...@googlemail.com on 22 Jun 2010 at 11:20

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes pleas. For better caching 

Original comment by itromp...@gmail.com on 23 Jun 2010 at 1:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Would be great!

Original comment by patrick....@gmail.com on 23 Jun 2010 at 9:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

FTW

Original comment by ribeiro...@gmail.com on 23 Jun 2010 at 6:00

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Я тоже голосую за добавление!

Original comment by chekal...@gmail.com on 25 Jun 2010 at 6:59

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by jscud.w...@gmail.com on 30 Jun 2010 at 1:46

• Added labels: APIType-Libs, Type-Suggestion
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Still waiting!

Original comment by mklickm...@gmail.com on 15 Jul 2010 at 3:20

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I am waiting since mklickman1 told me to via tweet.

Original comment by gillism...@gmail.com on 15 Jul 2010 at 3:24

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This would be awesome.

I might give you a cookie, Google. You want cookies? I heard you like cookies.
Mmmmm...

Original comment by simon.kjellberg on 15 Jul 2010 at 3:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Do it. Go on, do it.

Original comment by inverted...@gmail.com on 15 Jul 2010 at 3:51

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I would also want to second that request. Modernizr would be a great library in 
google apis.

Original comment by vit...@gmail.com on 15 Jul 2010 at 5:39

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Add to repository!

Original comment by mmacnaughton54 on 23 Jul 2010 at 5:23

[GoogleCodeExporter]

it would be awesome.

Original comment by maxchiu1...@gmail.com on 6 Aug 2010 at 1:39

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I'm not sure Modernizr is the end-all-be-all for this kind of thing, but it 
does work and it's widely used. I would find it helpful to have it up on 
Google's CDN. Thanks for your consideration, Google Gods!

Original comment by segdeha on 6 Aug 2010 at 1:49

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I would love for Modernizr to be hosted by google ajax apis. Now if only 
Filament Groups EnhanceJS and Remy Sharp's HTML5Shim can be hosted...........

Original comment by trenellg...@gmail.com on 7 Aug 2010 at 2:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please, host it with Google CDN indeed.

Original comment by etorea...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 7:27

[GoogleCodeExporter]

If you want support added, you need to STAR this issue.

Please stop adding comments requesting support. Spamming everyone who is 
following the guidelines will only make people want to un-star this issue.

Original comment by weinja...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 7:44

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, please stop replying to this issue. Haha, irony!

Original comment by peekaboo.caribou@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 7:49

[GoogleCodeExporter]

pretty please

Original comment by ver...@gmail.com on 10 Sep 2010 at 5:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I just learned of Modernizr, and would love to see it added to the api.

Original comment by patricka...@gmail.com on 10 Sep 2010 at 2:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

this needs to happen

Original comment by i...@dazeddigital.com on 15 Sep 2010 at 5:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

starred

Original comment by thoe...@gmail.com on 26 Sep 2010 at 8:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

do it!

Original comment by gcoll...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2010 at 4:59

[GoogleCodeExporter]

i'd like to see modernizr get added to the api!

Original comment by gon...@googlemail.com on 6 Oct 2010 at 12:42

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yeah baby.

Original comment by PhillipS...@gmail.com on 15 Oct 2010 at 4:28

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thumbs up!

Original comment by dimi...@forebits.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 10:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Go for it!

Original comment by krzysiek...@gmail.com on 6 Nov 2010 at 10:36

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Would be great

Original comment by harald.e...@gmail.com on 7 Nov 2010 at 2:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

OK, it's been said before but people seem to keep missing it, so I'll say it 
once more before I un-star the issue:

*****IF YOU WANT TO SUPPORT THIS ISSUE, THEN STAR IT, DON'T ADD A COMMENT.****

If you add a comment, it sends an email to everyone who has starred the issue, 
and your "yes please" isn't going to help convince Google. What will help is 
for it to have lots of stars, showing support for the issue. Adding useless 
comments means people (like me) are likely to un-star it to avoid getting all 
the emails, so it's counterproductive. Yes, I know that by adding this I'll be 
doing the same and it's so ironic/hypocritical etc etc, but I think it's 
probably worth one more email if it stops people adding more useless comments. 
Thank you and good night.

Original comment by ascor...@gmail.com on 7 Nov 2010 at 5:36

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by adam.fel...@gtempaccount.com on 10 Nov 2010 at 11:11

• Added labels: Type-New-Library
• Removed labels: Type-Suggestion

[GoogleCodeExporter]

please add!

Original comment by jonmears...@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2011 at 10:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes!

Original comment by apxsk...@gmail.com on 7 Mar 2011 at 7:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

If you're looking for a CDN that hosts Modernizr here are two:

http://www.cdnjs.com/
http://api.yandex.ru/jslibs/

Original comment by wrum...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2011 at 8:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

@Wrum, 

Thanks, but not this is a request for people looking for reliability and speed 
of the Google CDN, rather than other 100s of other CDNs that continue to popup 
and down over time.

Everyone, be sure to "star" the item, as comments do not help the cause.

This is a common problem across all of Google Code. Google is not known for 
their user experience, and thus people will continue to comment rather than 
star, until Google makes it a better experience for users.

Original comment by ch...@heavymark.com on 29 Mar 2011 at 8:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Is Google ignoring this to push Google Chrome Frame?

Original comment by harrypuj...@gmail.com on 12 Apr 2011 at 6:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

please~

Original comment by mcten...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 6:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I want it, too.

Original comment by toby...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 8:03

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Since tobyyun and mctenshi (among many other people), seem to be illiterate, 
and can't understand that only staring the issue will bring it to Google's 
attention, I'm going to unstar it. It doesn't look like Google will be adding 
it anytime soon, and I'm not interested in getting spammed for no reason.

Original comment by spenser....@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:33

[GoogleCodeExporter]

@41 me too.

Original comment by stefanho...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

@41 So will I. Getting multiple emails with "yes" and "please" is pretty 
annoying.

Original comment by a.graf%a...@gtempaccount.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Same

Original comment by jconto...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 3:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

yeh me too, maybe others who do so could not respond with a message, so save 
everyone from getting another annyoing email ;) sorry!

Original comment by scruffy...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 4:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

You're making it worse! (and now I'm making it worse ...)

Original comment by dgoul...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 4:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The whole bleeding heart thing here about 44 posts over a year and a half is 
pretty great entertainment. If it's so disturbing to these people why did they 
not setup a filter in their email client or contact the OP to see if he can 
modify his post to instruct people to star only. The first decent comment about 
starring only is 30 posts into this thread at which point most people have 
stopped reading. This is the only subject I've ever stared on Google code and I 
assume there are many who starred it that are in the same shoes as me but 
didn't see comment # 30. I sincerely apologize on their behalf for not being an 
elitist here at google code. 

Oh, and the hypocrisy of those bleeding hearts posting their unsubscribe 
notices that outnumber the recent people supporting it is like 4chan gold.

Original comment by jared0x90@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 4:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

--------------------------------
READ THIS BEFORE COMMENTING:

DON'T COMMENT, FFS!
--------------------------------

Original comment by low...@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 4:16

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Enough. Star or no star, comment or no comment -- this system of advocating for 
a change is clearly broken.

This issue was opened August 25, 2009. It is the third most "starred" issue in 
the project. In the last year and a half, 699 people have starred the issue and 
suffered through bouts of crap like this morning (which I am now contributing 
to) as a result, because our interest in having this library added to the API 
is that high.

Has there been a single reply from anyone at Google responsible for this code 
base? You know, maybe something like:

* "We are definitely considering adding this library in a future release of our 
API."
* "We will not be adding this library to our API, because..."
* "In order for us to consider adding a library to our API, that library must 
meet the following conditions..."

Anything at all would be helpful. I could never imagine letting an issue in any 
project I manage (open source or not) go unanswered for this long without some 
kind of acknowledgement at a minimum. It's borderline irresponsible that Google 
is continuing to do so.

In the meantime, I too am joining the unstar brigade. Maybe this will attract 
enough attention to at least warrant a *response* from someone, if not actual 
action.

Original comment by jim.ere....@gmail.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 4:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by paulir...@google.com on 13 Apr 2011 at 4:56

• Added labels: Restrict-AddIssueComment-Commit