Closed ghost closed 4 years ago
I'd like to see the same options as in Joplin and Evernote webclipper: Article Simplified article Screenshot Full page Bookmark (url)
So I've added an "Article" and "Bookmark" options for the next version. Screenshot is a bit difficult because of how attachments are handled in Standard Notes.
@rafikiphoto can you expand on what you mean for "Simplified article" and "Full page"?
You can try it now: https://github.com/johnjones4/Standard-Notes-Clipper/releases/tag/1.4.0
It works! Currently, I use the bold editor to save articles as any other note format takes the HTML with it and it looks odd. Are there plans to implement the Joplin-style simplified article i.e. the same as it is right now but preformatted?
Also, it would be a great idea to have a 'source' link at the bottom of article, highlight and area clips to know on which URL the clipped text was found.
What do you think of the two above ideas?
I've opened #15 to add source URL and I'm also going to implement a new feature related to this to modify the formatting of the clipped content based on their preferred editor (#16). I'll also address the Joplin-style simplification feature under this ticket.
I've now implemented HTML cleanup for the "Article" mode. @Kazer999 can you test it out here https://github.com/johnjones4/Standard-Notes-Clipper/releases/tag/1.5.0 ?
Amazing. Thank you so much for your efforts in making SN user's life easier. This ticket can be closed afaic.
Hi @johnjones4, seems like I posted without seeing your comment. The HTML is definitely cleaner and less intrusive now, but using the bold editor will no longer clip the picture(s) of an article (whereas it used to do that in the past).
I tested 1.4 and 1.5 on this article and the latest version doesn't clip the image.
It appears the HTML scrubbing module I've used doesn't allow img tags by default. I've corrected this for the next release. Do you think it would make sense to offer control of the HTML tags whitelist in settings?
Tested and this works great now. As for your whitelisting suggestion: I personally wouldn't do it, keeping the SN ethos of simplicity in mind. This adds complexity for the user, assuming some of them won't know what it's for. Adding to the whitelist made sense as other clippers from competing products do the same thing, and they don't provide the option to 'leave out images when clipping' - something I've never read a single complaint about. Keeping that in mind, I would leave it as it is right now - my 2 cents.
Makes sense! I definitely don't want to overthink the features on this project and then end up supporting things no one cares about. Thanks!
Are there plans to support the following clipping modes in the future?
Thanks in advance for your reply!