Closed MomoMoses closed 1 year ago
is this a quick fix? if so, let's do it before launch if at all possible.
priority #1 only if do-able fairly quickly. if not, then priority-2, which may bump it to phase 3.
This is now fixed in https://github.com/uchicago-library/bmrc/commit/40e586b8f2ecef51db992592fdf487757bd6065a and live on bmrc-test.lib.
Genreform was missing, but all of the other elements that you mentioned should have already been clickable. Please let me know if this looks good or if I should keep debugging.
Continuing with my perusal of DePaul records I came across this in this collection
<genreform source="ingest">University records</genreform>
<corpname source="ingest">DePaul University--Students--Archives</corpname>
</controlaccess>`
Here, the genreform is not clickable. Is the attribute "source" somehow interfering? OK, wait, I'm checking the other test site now.
NEVER MIND! it's fixed in the other site...
Looks good. If I come across anything not clickable it's probably a weird edge case. I can note it here and then determine further course of action.
BMRC.CHM.AF-AM-POLICE-LEAGUE.xml has non-clickable genreform tags. Also: BMRC.CHM.ACLU-CHI-CHAP.xml Looking into the data.
Please let me know if there is anything I can check on my end.
With the most recent finding aid updates and other fixes, this now appears to be fine. As of February 2022 uploads and transformations.
Along with persname, corpname, geogname, and subject, genreform and occupation are frequently used as "subject" categories with which to find related materials. Ideally, these would be clickable and function the same way as the subject headings.