Closed nunotexbsd closed 3 years ago
@nunotexbsd Even better, this must be part of base. @emaste You and me have invested quite some time into this tool. Do you see a chance to have this in base as a suitable replacement for svnlite? This would make the system complete and solve the chicken and egg problem.
yes! It would be so cool!
What could we do? Talk with who? To make it happen?
I think it's solid enough now that we can remove the beta warning. Thank you!
:) Thank you!
Let's discuss the idea of bringing into base on the freebsd-git mailing list.
One note is that the base system prefers that we adhere to style(9); the largest divergence is probably the >80 col lines in gitup.c. I passed gitup.c through clang-format to see what it would do, and put the result in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28541 (also https://github.com/emaste/gitup/commit/85c37a6a2eabca9a3521a3e037990af9708fc2e9). In any case I think we should discuss it on the mailing list first.
It would be good to apply capsicum(4), but that's also something that can be discussed separately.
on the freebsd-git mailing list
@michael-o or @johnmehr feel free to start a thread on that if you like, or I will get to it a little bit later on.
I've just subscribed freebsd-git and I'm following phabricator.
Thanks all!
Should I close this issue?
I will close it when https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28608 is ready to land :)
https://www.freshports.org/net/gitup/
Thank you!
Hello!
pkg-message says:
"Currently this program is beta, so the usual caveats/warnings (don't use it in a production environment, make sure you've got backups, dont (yet) run as root) apply."
When can I delete this message? What is current state of gitup? Beta?
Yesterday, I used gitup to fetch FreeBSD 12.2 src and it worked fast like a charm. I compiled a port that needed src and everything is working fine.
Thanks,
Nuno Teixeira