Open johnnythesnake12 opened 10 months ago
Allowing numbers in the name field was meant to differentiate between people with the same names e.g. appending an employee number at the back of the name. However, we still expect HR managers to key in the person's actual name at the start of the name field, which begins with an alphabetical character by convention.
The UG segment screenshotted above provides an example of the use case mentioned earlier.
However, we recognise the vagueness of the error message in not specifying the need for the first character to be an alphabetical character and thus would include this provision in the error message/UG for improved clarity.
Additionally, we are downgrading the severity of the bug to low as we do not expect anyone's name to begin with a digit, nor for a sizeable proportion of HR managers to run into this particular error.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
If alphanumeric means either letters or numbers are accepted, i believe that by that logic, a name with just numbers should be accepted, moreover, a name with just alphabets are accepted.