johnpipo1712 / support-tools

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/support-tools
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Some issue attachment links still do not work #50

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Sorry for being picky about this.

I have 249 attachments in my GoogleCodeProjectHosting.json.

Using the info from issue 39 (comment indices are 0-based) I managed to obtain 
links to 122 attachments (listed in good-links.txt).

Apparently another 112 of the attachments actually use 1-based indices in the 
links  (listed in bad-fixable.txt).

Yet there are still 15 attachment links that *do not work at all* (listed in 
bad-unfixable.txt).

See the attached files for the links. I used the projects tint2 and pmn.

--

As a workaround I tried to use directly the links visible on the Google Code 
webpage, which look like this:

https://pmn.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=10004000&name=magic&token=remov
edthesecrettoken

and download all of them to my computer. However I *have to* include the secret 
token parameter in the URL otherwise the script gets redirected to a Sign In 
page which it cannot handle (as it is not a browser). It is not clear how to 
obtain that token.

Finally, I tried copy-pasting the token from the browser to my script but 
apparently a separate token is required for each attachment, so my conclusion 
is that it is impossible to automate this process except maybe with a browser 
extension that crawls the whole issue tracker.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by mrovi9...@gmail.com on 18 Mar 2015 at 12:52

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
And I am not even sure that I have really "fixed" some of the bad links, as I 
sometimes see colliding file names in different comments like this:

User comment 1: Something doesn't work, attaches config.txt
User comment 2: Workaround doesn't work either, attaches config.txt

Original comment by mrovi9...@gmail.com on 18 Mar 2015 at 12:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thank you for the bug report. I will take a look.

Original comment by chrsm...@google.com on 18 Mar 2015 at 3:21