Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Additionally, in a slightly related topic, if when submitting a promo, the
precise
topic_path that you want to use is not yet entered in the selection list, how
is this
best handled?
Is it possible to have an additional text field (along with the selection list)
to
enter an additional topic_path if the one they want to add is not listed.
Original comment by jgty...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2009 at 4:02
On the projects model lets make project required = False and also allow for
adding topic paths. Also I think
editors should handle projects, since it is a higher level thing. If you are
submitting a promo and it's part of a
project then we can have an project notes field where you can add that
information and then the editor will
process the promo submission and possibly assign the promo to a project.
We should also note that projects tend to be sub-projects. So there is a
tendency to have an over-arching
project composed of multiple sub-projects, each produced by three or four
students. This can make projects
a little more complicated than we like it. My suggestion to keep projects for
the over-arching one, not the
sub-projects.
Original comment by mand...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2009 at 9:33
I agree about your description of sub-projects.
Would it be helpful to deal with sub-projects in the same way we would topics?
Stories belonging to a specific sub-project could have a unique topic_path and
use
its own template for display.
Thanks for the clarification on the required field.
Original comment by jgty...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2009 at 9:44
We do not want to expand projects at this point. We want to set limits to our
features at this point and see how
it goes over. Think of managing projects like affiliates, mainly an editoral
task.
Original comment by mand...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2009 at 9:47
see r327
Original comment by jgty...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 12:17
The patch looks great. thanks!
Original comment by mand...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 5:34
I'm opening this ticket back up because I think projects is important and this
thread probably is not finished
since we don't have projects in the interface yet.
Original comment by mand...@gmail.com
on 3 May 2009 at 10:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jgty...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2009 at 3:53