Open BloederFuchs opened 6 years ago
GinoGalotti
commented
6 years ago Thanks for the heads up. So... do they need an extra attack modifier deck for the City enemies? That's not going to be an easy change because of how we treat that special deck (having it duplicated might be hard). I'll try to give it a chance.
The Imp fix is easy, I'll try to push it in a bit!
BloederFuchs
commented
6 years ago It's not really an issue, because adding those decks manually worked A-OK for us. You just have to copy-paste the setup for scenario 36, only swapping out the Prime Demon for the Captain of the Guard. The only difference, really, is that players have to resolve actions differently depending on which scenario they chose:
Battlements A (#35) - Demons are allied, Guards are hostile, Captain of the Guard is a hostile boss Battlements B (#36) - Demons are hostile, Guards are allied, Prime Demon is a hostile boss
So the only thing you have to really do for 35 is incorporate the Captain of the Guard modifier deck, and set checkmarks for City Archers and Guards
GinoGalotti
commented
6 years ago Ooh, my bad. The attack modifier deck is the monster deck, not the attack modifier deck (+1/-1 one). So... which change are you proposing? Shall we just change the decks preselected when we chose those scenarios?
Right now, we have:
{ name: "#35 Gloomhaven Battlements A"
, decks:
[ {"name": "Flame Demon"}
, {"name": "Frost Demon"}
, {"name": "Earth Demon"}
, {"name": "Wind Demon"}
, {"name": "City Archer"}
, {"name": "City Guard"}
, {"name": "Boss: Captain of the Guard"}
]
},
{ name: "#36 Gloomhaven Battlements B"
, decks:
[ {"name": "Flame Demon"}
, {"name": "Frost Demon"}
, {"name": "Earth Demon"}
, {"name": "Wind Demon"}
, {"name": "City Archer"}
, {"name": "Boss: Prime Demon"}
]
Which change will make it easier for your group? Showing only the hostile groups? Having 2 apps running?
Scenario 35 is missing the attack modifier decks for City Archers, City Guards and the Boss (Captain of the Guard).
Also, the same issue I recently reported for Shamans is also there for imps: they're missing the range value on their non-self heals.
Cheers