Closed bota87 closed 1 year ago
I need to use a port different from the default 80, can you add a variable to make this configurable?
That should be accomplishable, yes! Would you be able to share what the reason is that you want to control and change this parameter?
sure, I would like to set network_mode: service:wireguard
on the jam container to exit with a vpn but the port 80 it's already in use
sure, I would like to set
network_mode: service:wireguard
on the jam container to exit with a vpn but the port 80 it's already in use
Would you be able to test https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam-docker/pull/108 and report back if it worked the way you need it? That be great :pray:
I tried to build the image from source but failed, so I edited the jam-entrypoint directly on the running container and I made an image from there. That resolved the conflict for nginx but now the tor service give error, I already have another one attached to the wireguard container so I need a custom port even for that...
$ docker build --label "local" --build-arg JAM_REPO_REF=master --build-arg JM_SERVER_REPO_REF=master --tag "jam" ./standalone
Please try again with the following and report if it builds successfully:
$ docker build --no-cache --label "local" --build-arg JAM_REPO_REF=master --build-arg JM_SERVER_REPO_REF=v0.9.9 --tag "jam" ./standalone
I already have another one attached to the wireguard container so I need a custom port even for that..
Hmm.. maybe it is best to just extend the "standalone" image and build you own image with the values adapted to satisfy your needs? It is done similarly for the regtest env within Jam: https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam/blob/master/docker/regtest/dockerfile-deps/joinmarket/webui-standalone/Dockerfile
(however, with the dev
image, rather than prod). Would that be an acceptable solution for you?
Please try again with the following and report if it builds successfully:
$ docker build --no-cache --label "local" --build-arg JAM_REPO_REF=master --build-arg JM_SERVER_REPO_REF=v0.9.9 --tag "jam"
That worked!
maybe it is best to just extend the "standalone" image and build you own image Would that be an acceptable solution for you?
Yeah I can try that way, or maybe even better I try to use the ui-only image Thank's for the support, the issue can be closed for me
That worked!
:raised_hands:
Yeah I can try that way, or maybe even better I try to use the ui-only image Thank's for the support, the issue can be closed for me
Perfect. Closing! Thank you :pray:
I need to use a port different from the default 80, can you add a variable to make this configurable?