Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
When you plugin in the drive again, it is not actually re-hashing the file or
downloading the information from AniDB again. The messages you see are probably
a bit misleading.
What it actually does is detect a "new" file.
When a file is being hashed, it actually checks the database to see if it has a
record for that absolute path first, and then skips the hash if it exists. The
same is true for the downloading of information from AniDB.
However it is necessary to add these files to the hasher queue, so as not to
hold up the main thread with these checks.
I will test it out to make sure it is actually behaving this way.
It should be fairly easy to tell based on how long it takes to process the
queues.
Do you find that you can't actually use JMM desktop while this is happening?
I will test it out myself in a couple of days as well.
When you say the files are removed from the collection, what do u mean?
Are you referring to the exclamation mark in JMM Desktop?
If so, that just means it couldn't find the physical file. Database entries are
never removed unless you actually manually invoke that function across your
whole collection.
on (3) No this doesn't happen. It is the same process as described above, where
it may say it is importing/downloading, but it is actually just an integrity
check.
But having a button to delete images associated with series you no longer have
in your collection is probably a good idea.
(4) I'll go with the purge instead
(5) I am glad you are enjoying it :)
At the moment, I'm happy to bear the very small hosting costs of the web cache myself.
If JMM ever gets popular enough that the hosting costs make me uncomfortable I'll ask for donations then :)
Original comment by werndly...@gmail.com
on 30 Oct 2012 at 10:10
I've tested this and don't get the behaviour you are seeing.
Even if I try and scan the whole import folder again, it will only process
files that it hasn't processed yet.
Original comment by werndly...@gmail.com
on 6 Dec 2012 at 5:07
Original comment by werndly...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2014 at 5:15
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Thephire...@gmail.com
on 30 Oct 2012 at 6:14