Open PapaCharlie opened 4 years ago
Incidentally, this change preserves the old behavior of errors from reading the dbf being completely ignored. I don't think this is a good idea. Is the DBF file necessary? Should it be possible to opt-out entirely, or have a better failure mode if it cannot be read?
Merging #43 into master will decrease coverage by
0.29%
. The diff coverage is40.74%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #43 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 60.09% 59.80% -0.30%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 802 821 +19
==========================================
+ Hits 482 491 +9
- Misses 264 272 +8
- Partials 56 58 +2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
reader.go | 59.60% <40.74%> (-1.77%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9fd306a...0c70531. Read the comment docs.
This will allow for different sources (e.g. network) to be used when reading ShapeFiles