ConfigSpec does describe the class well - it represents the
specification of a config item. From the user's perspective, however, it
might seem a bit strange, since the only time the user sees the class is
when reading about or implementing actions. Rename ConfigSpec to
Action to, hopefully, reduce confusion.
ConfigSpec
does describe the class well - it represents the specification of a config item. From the user's perspective, however, it might seem a bit strange, since the only time the user sees the class is when reading about or implementing actions. RenameConfigSpec
toAction
to, hopefully, reduce confusion.