Paul Bartha pointed out to me that it would be helpful to make explicit, in the soundness proofs for trees, that the assumption is the satisfiability of the sentence of each form along with some set gamma. This will make the reasoning of the proof clearer. I agree. I should add that in the two metalogic chapters.
Paul Bartha pointed out to me that it would be helpful to make explicit, in the soundness proofs for trees, that the assumption is the satisfiability of the sentence of each form along with some set gamma. This will make the reasoning of the proof clearer. I agree. I should add that in the two metalogic chapters.