jonathanvajda
commented
1 year ago Here are some notes I prepared, just to get this started:
return to:
credential role A role that inheres in a concretization of an identity document and is realized by an authentication process.
Equivalent class: to BFO_0000023[role] and (RO_0000054[realized in] some authentication) and (RO_0000052[characteristic of/inheres in] some (RO_0000053[characterized by/bearer of] some (RO_0000059[concretizes] some 'identity document')))
Moved: 'deontic declaration performer role' from subclass 'role' to subclass 'Deontic Role'
Theoretically obviated:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0020021
identity document A document that denotes some identity and is concretized by the bearer of some credential role. Amanda Hicks
document and ('is about' some 'documented identity') and ('is concretized as' some ('specifically dependent continuant' and ('inheres in' some ('bearer of' some 'credential role')))) and ('is concretized as' only ('specifically dependent continuant' and ('inheres in' some ('bearer of' some 'credential role'))))
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0020022
documented identity A documented identity is the aggregate of all data items about an entity. Notice that a documented identity is not itself a document since a document is intended to be understood as a whole and data items about an individual are usually scattered across different documents.
comment: is an aggregate of ICEs also an ICE? yes Is part_of the appropriate relation to use for data items and documented identities?
Amanda Hicks
('has part' some 'information content entity') and ( inverse ('is about') some 'identity document') and ('has part' only 'information content entity')
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMRSE_00000033 'aggregate of organizations' EQUIV: http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/GroupOfOrganizations
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMRSE_00000022 'collection of organisms' (it is a defined class with no obvious use)
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMRSE_00000023 'collection of humans' EQUIV: http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/GroupOfPersons
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0100026 'organism' (it has no obvious use)
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_9606 'Homo sapiens' EQUIV: http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Person
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000245 'organization' EQUIV: http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Organization
SKIP: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0021003 'social act' EQUIV: http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/SocialAct
Various terms in CCO/Mid/AgentOntology belong as subclasses of "Deontic Role"
- Allegiance Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/AllegianceRole -- Ally Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/AllyRole -- Enemy Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/EnemyRole -- Neutral Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/NeutralRole
- Authority Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/AuthorityRole
- Citizen Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Citizen Role
- Civilian Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Civilian Role
- Commercial Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Commercial Role
- Contractor Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Contractor Role
- Interpersonal Relationship Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Interpersonal Relationship Role
- Occupation Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Occupation Role
- Operator Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Operator Role
- Organization Member Role http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Organization Member Role
(not: Component Role, Infrastructure Role, Part Role, System Role)
Many of the classes and data tagged in IAO-D-Acts (the original) are the same entities in this ontology. There needs to be clear documentation as for what is or is not picking out the same individuals. E.g., some deontic roles are equivalent, but some deontic act documents are not equivalent. I need to provide clear guidance why they are or are not equivalent, so that translation can be understood by humans.