Open keenerb opened 1 year ago
Not a solution, but the it is recommended in the Wiki page to use Postscript printer for Win 3.x, and it seems to work fine. I printed README.WRI, and WINLOGO.BMP. The .ps file is converted to .pdf for better accessibility. Perhaps worth trying while waiting for a fix. krnl386_000.pdf krnl386_001.pdf
The PS output does the same thing for me. Perhaps it's something on my end then?
Looks like converting from .ps to .pdf isn't working. I use Acrobat distiller, but I tried online ps to pdf converters and works as well. krnl386_000.pdf krnl386_000.ps.txt
You can try using a newer Adobe Postscript driver. For Windows 3.1x in particular, you can try the steps outlined here to get newer PostScript output: https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging/wiki/Windows-3.1x#adobe-postscript-3-printer-driver
Ohh and yes, as mentioned on the dosbox-x wiki page: https://dosbox-x.com/wiki/Guide%3ASetting-up-printing-in-DOSBox%E2%80%90X and https://dosbox-x.com/wiki/Guide%3AInstalling-Windows-3.1x#_enabling_printing
The Epson emulation has known problems and can look rather poor. Nobody has touched that code in I don't know how long, so it is probably best to look for other options such as native PostScript output (not Epson to PostScript!)
For what it's worth, I actually busted out my old Epson Actionprinter 3000 and duplicated the experiment.
The behaviour in dosbox-x is identical to what I see running the 24-pin Epson with a 9-pin driver selected in graphical mode...
https://github.com/RWAP/PrinterToPDF
Seems to be a very functional and up-to-date EPson esc/P and esc/p2 to PDF converter, as used by the Retroprinter interface. Just in case someone wants to modernize the print emulator.
Describe the bug
Using Printmaster, Printshop, or Windows 3.1 configured for Epson FX-80 or generic Epson always prints with pagination/margin errors.
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
Expected behavior
I expect printout to be properly formatted
What operating system(s) this bug have occurred on?
Windows 11 22H2
What version(s) of DOSBox-X have this bug?
2023.05.01
Used configuration
Output log
No response
Additional information
It looks like the aspect ratio is skewed on the printout, letters seem narrower and taller than they should be
Have you checked that no similar bug report(s) exist?
Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines