Closed chenghuzi closed 1 year ago
@jasmainak maybe we can finish this first and turn that histogram stuff into another PR?
Merging #636 (a6902c4) into master (cdd4050) will decrease coverage by
0.31%
. The diff coverage is64.86%
.:exclamation: Current head a6902c4 differs from pull request most recent head d20424a. Consider uploading reports for the commit d20424a to get more accurate results
:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #636 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.19% 91.89% -0.31%
==========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 4282 4316 +34
==========================================
+ Hits 3948 3966 +18
- Misses 334 350 +16
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
hnn_core/gui/_viz_manager.py | 86.93% <64.86%> (-2.91%) |
:arrow_down: |
We have discussed adding the feature of a layered histogram into the default figure. This will be a separate PR. For now, maybe it would be better for us to merge this one first.
I just gave this a shot but I'm confused how exactly to use it:
Target data: None means what? I can't figure out what to compare to what. Can you share what you see and/or what you did?
Also, some of the loaded data starts to appear in the simulations ... that's a bit confusing:
I think you should maintain separate lists of simulations and loaded data
I just gave this a shot but I'm confused how exactly to use it:
Target data: None means what? I can't figure out what to compare to what. Can you share what you see and/or what you did?
None
means there's no comparison in the current plot. It's not every time that the user want to compare some simulations against others. Without this null choice, the system will use the first value in options to compare.
Also, some of the loaded data starts to appear in the simulations ... that's a bit confusing:
I think you should maintain separate lists of simulations and loaded data
I don't think so, we discussed this before and agreed on the current solution, i.e., to put everything under the same structure as essentially they are the same except that there's no Net
objects in recorded data. But I renamed a bit in the latest commit to make it more clear to the user.
Is this ready to go or were there more changes to be made after yesterday's mtg?
@chenghuzi happy to merge whenever you give the go ahead
@chenghuzi happy to merge whenever you give the go ahead
LGTM
sorry this was an open tab on my browser ... just realized it has been merged, but feel free to clarify my question :)
As titled.
Demo (updated):