Closed Pi2048 closed 9 years ago
I also agree that we should mainly rely on spam filters. It's simply not possible to fully hide email addresses for crawlers in a user friendly way. I believe many of the public jd email addresses are already out in the open so we need good spam filters anyway.
The obfuscation you added in commit cb3bd219b7ed6c97d67293d5bccd89dd8ec18569 is a good first line of defence.
@bartromgens, thanks for giving your view.
Merged the branch for now. I'll leave it to Bas to evaluate the functionality. To me, this issue is closed for now.
Agree with the discussion in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/748780/best-way-to-obfuscate-an-e-mail-address-on-a-website. When using spamfilters there is a good protection and a userfriendly way, so according to me a good option.
I have chosen this approach based on the discussion on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/748780/best-way-to-obfuscate-an-e-mail-address-on-a-website, but I welcome other views. There, people argue that spam filtering works better than e-mail address hiding, and I'm inclined to agree with them. This approach will stop the basic attacks, and spam filters will hopefully work against the more sophisticated ones.
I explicitly would like to hear people's views before I merge my solution to master.