Closed peterjc closed 2 years ago
Yes, the jove-VER.tgz are generated by me using 'make tgz' and added manually to the assets, so they contain a few generated output files to save from people needing groff, ctags to read the docs, allows jove to build as long as you have a compiler, includes and make, which most distros do. It should be fine to build from the github-generated tarball (though I'll look at harmonizing the two). ChangeLog and LICENSE should be in the github tar too, but old/ shouldn't, I'll update .gitattributes. I should figure out how to get travis or git actions to make the other assets for me automatically...
Great - so I'm fine building directly for the tagged commits in git for conda-forge. Thanks!
Do you want to keep this open for automating the asset upload? Or shall we close it?
Closing. While I still intend to automate asset upload, and make some progress with github actions, no need to keep this open on that intention...
The following tar balls are different, first github's automatic snapshot of the the repository as of the tag:
https://github.com/jonmacs/jove/archive/4.17.3.6.tar.gz (478K)
And second, this which was uploaded as an asset to the release by the Jove maintainers:
https://github.com/jonmacs/jove/releases/download/4.17.3.6/jove-4.17.3.6.tgz (814K)
Looking at the list of files,
Could you confirm that from the point of view of wanting to compile everything locally, they are interchangeable?
Is the missing larger
jove-4.17.3.7.tgz
and other assets on the 4.17.3.7 release (and some older releases) an oversight?https://github.com/jonmacs/jove/releases/tag/4.17.3.7
vs:
https://github.com/jonmacs/jove/releases/tag/4.17.3.6 https://github.com/jonmacs/jove/releases/tag/4.17.2.7
(Asking from the perspective of automation, cross reference https://github.com/conda-forge/jove-feedstock/pull/3 )