Enhancement feature: Size feature, what bout the bigg boys

[bravechief]

The size options only go up to XXL, no 3XL, 4XL, 5XL. As a member of the big people population, I am very disappointed

[jonmer85]

@bravechief I agree that we need to be more flexible with sizing. For now we want to throw the bare minimum of size options to the designer and let them drive what sizes we offer. We may even introduce a new feature in which we allow the designer to specify a custom size. I am closing this for now but this is good feedback

[senbay]

Why close it?? Should leave it open as a low enhancement

On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:29 AM, jonmer85 notifications@github.com wrote:

Closed #621.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[jonmer85]

It's because I want designers to drive this requirement (and thus reopen a new enhancement). If we leave it, it will remain as noise. (Plus we can always find it and reopen)

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:32 AM, snicka notifications@github.com wrote:

Why close it?? Should leave it open as a low enhancement

On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:29 AM, jonmer85 notifications@github.com wrote:

Closed #621.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonmer85/Tinville/issues/621#issuecomment-87702827.

[jonmer85]

@Dizzyab , @Batman1500 , @nsoucie What do you guys think of this. The intention was to not have so many options in the list to choose from. One thing I have thought of is to support a custom sizing option but that is more work.

[jonmer85]

Decision to leave it open as an enhancement in which we let designers input their own custom size types. It should be noted that these custom size types will not be easily searchable, sortable, etc within a scope larger than a particular designer's shop

[nsoucie]

This might sound stupid but what is the point if it's not easily searchable I say leave it off for now until we have designers that need it?

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2015, at 2:10 PM, jonmer85 notifications@github.com wrote:

Decision to leave it open as an enhancement in which we let designers input their own custom size types. It should be noted that these custom size types will not be easily searchable, sortable, etc within a scope larger than a particular designer's shop

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[jonmer85]

I agree with Nicole

On Monday, March 30, 2015, nsoucie notifications@github.com wrote:

This might sound stupid but what is the point if it's not easily searchable I say leave it off for now until we have designers that need it?

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2015, at 2:10 PM, jonmer85 <notifications@github.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:

Decision to leave it open as an enhancement in which we let designers input their own custom size types. It should be noted that these custom size types will not be easily searchable, sortable, etc within a scope larger than a particular designer's shop

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonmer85/Tinville/issues/621#issuecomment-87837457.

[senbay]

But what if we have a designer that likes to make clothes for us big peeps and we don't have that feature we lose them

On Mar 30, 2015, at 5:37 PM, jonmer85 notifications@github.com wrote:

I agree with Nicole

On Monday, March 30, 2015, nsoucie notifications@github.com wrote:

This might sound stupid but what is the point if it's not easily searchable I say leave it off for now until we have designers that need it?

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2015, at 2:10 PM, jonmer85 <notifications@github.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:

Decision to leave it open as an enhancement in which we let designers input their own custom size types. It should be noted that these custom size types will not be easily searchable, sortable, etc within a scope larger than a particular designer's shop

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonmer85/Tinville/issues/621#issuecomment-87837457.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[nsoucie]

Noooooo lol I mean leave it off until we have a designer that needs it :)

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:01 PM, snicka notifications@github.com wrote:

But what if we have a designer that likes to make clothes for us big peeps and we don't have that feature we lose them

On Mar 30, 2015, at 5:37 PM, jonmer85 notifications@github.com wrote:

I agree with Nicole

On Monday, March 30, 2015, nsoucie notifications@github.com wrote:

This might sound stupid but what is the point if it's not easily searchable I say leave it off for now until we have designers that need it?

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2015, at 2:10 PM, jonmer85 <notifications@github.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:

Decision to leave it open as an enhancement in which we let designers input their own custom size types. It should be noted that these custom size types will not be easily searchable, sortable, etc within a scope larger than a particular designer's shop

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonmer85/Tinville/issues/621#issuecomment-87837457.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[Dizzyab]

I think we should really consider having another set of sizes, they can be hidden or we can do that accordion thing again. Do we really want to wait until a designer is disappointed because they didn't find what they needed right away?

[jonmer85]

So add XXL and XXXL to the existing sizes? That's the easiest thing to do.

On Monday, March 30, 2015, Dizzyab notifications@github.com wrote:

I think we should really consider having another set of sizes, they can be hidden or we can do that accordion thing again. Do we really want to wait until a designer is disappointed because they didn't find what they needed right away?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonmer85/Tinville/issues/621#issuecomment-87881873.

[Dizzyab]

Yes, can we make it like an accordion? this way we display the initial sizes but still have those options available

[jonmer85]

No this is a standard browser drop down box that would be weird to change. The designer will see the option. He good thing is the customer won't see it unless the designer offers those sizes.

On Monday, March 30, 2015, Dizzyab notifications@github.com wrote:

Yes, can we make it like an accordion? this way we display the initial sizes but still have those options available

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonmer85/Tinville/issues/621#issuecomment-87884955.

[senbay]

I agree

On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:13 PM, Dizzyab notifications@github.com wrote:

I think we should really consider having another set of sizes, they can be hidden or we can do that accordion thing again. Do we really want to wait until a designer is disappointed because they didn't find what they needed right away?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[Dizzyab]

cool