Closed jonnybest closed 12 years ago
according to the specs (daniel jackson's book appendix B, page 270), there is no other arity on multiplicity than 1: "if the expression denotes a set (that is, a unary relation), it may be prefixed by a multiplicity keyword"
and if it's not a set, you may not use the mults.
e.g. (forall ((x0 Atom)) (=> (in_1 x0 Node) (lone (join_1x2 (a2r_1 x0)
they get generated in generateMultConstrRight in Translator.java line 1121
edit: changed title from "mults have no associated arity"