Closed HarrisonGrodin closed 3 years ago
@jonsterling I'm not sure I follow - I think it's updated in the paper? Here, nat
is just defined as U (meta ℕ)
in Calf/Types/Nat.agda
.
(Although, I think that's a bug in the paper - it says nat = meta ℕ
, but should say U (meta ℕ)
? cc: @kaonn)
Oh LOL, I misunderstood what thisPR was doing. Please ignore me!
@jonsterling I'm not sure I follow - I think it's updated in the paper? Here,
nat
is just defined asU (meta ℕ)
inCalf/Types/Nat.agda
.(Although, I think that's a bug in the paper - it says
nat = meta ℕ
, but should sayU (meta ℕ)
? cc: @kaonn)
Yes I'll fix that.
Honestly, if this works already, then I think we should consider updating the paper because this will be less confusing to the referees. But it's up to y'all.