Closed HarrisonGrodin closed 3 years ago
That wasn't so bad! Toughest part was noticing the theorem statement:
sort/recurrence≡* : ∀ k n → sort/recurrence k n ≡ k * n
which conveniently ended up being very clean (and ⌈log₂_⌉-free!).
⌈log₂_⌉
Actually, huh, realization - the analysis for merge sort might as well be ≡, not Nat.≤.
≡
Nat.≤
(Rephrased analysis accordingly.)
That wasn't so bad! Toughest part was noticing the theorem statement:
which conveniently ended up being very clean (and
⌈log₂_⌉
-free!).