Closed arikalish closed 3 years ago
I could imagine that the type conversion code could fail in an edge case like that. What is the C#/.NET type you're sending into Insight? is it a string or a GUID?
In one case we pass in a string and in the other case we pass in GUIDs.
Something like this:
Guid[] orderedIds = new [] { a bunch of Guids };
var command = new SqlCommand("The_Sproc")
{
CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure
};
var ids = CreateDataTableWithIncrementingIdAndGuid(orderedIds);
var sqlParameters = command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ids", ids);
sqlParameters.SqlDbType = SqlDbType.Structured;
private static DataTable CreateDataTableWithIncrementingIdAndGuid(Guid[] orderedIds)
{
var ids = new DataTable();
ids.Columns.Add(new DataColumn("ItemOrder", typeof(int))
{
AutoIncrement = true,
AutoIncrementSeed = 0,
AutoIncrementStep = 1
});
ids.Columns.Add("ItemId", typeof(Guid));
foreach (var ids in orderedIds)
ids.Rows.Add(null, id);
return ids;
}
I went back and tried changing the sample test program from:
var orderedList = new[] { "a72863cf-c573-4bf8-9a0b-02212f84698a", "56a0c8ef-c826-45a5-bbce-fb334e59f4b7", "26525d03-1a64-4843-bab4-9daf88e9ae02" };
to
var orderedList = new[] { new Guid("a72863cf-c573-4bf8-9a0b-02212f84698a"), new Guid("56a0c8ef-c826-45a5-bbce-fb334e59f4b7"), new Guid("26525d03-1a64-4843-bab4-9daf88e9ae02") };
and the crash goes away. Updated the in-app code that uses a similar pattern and things seem OK there. The example in my first response where the DataTable
isn't crashing - looks like that was a misunderstanding. The first crash prevented me from easily getting to the second one.
Yup - my guess is that there's a missing conversion step when we go from an object type (string) to a value type (guid). Usually there's a missing boxing or unboxing in the code. I'll take a look at a fix.
You probably have workarounds making sure that you're mapping string
=> nvarchar
and converting in the sql side, or making sure that you pass Guid
=> uniqueidentifier
but who wants to do that? Am I right? :)
or making sure that you pass Guid => uniqueidentifier but who wants to do that? Am I right? :)
Hah yes. It'd definitely save folks down the road from some surprises!
Thanks for taking a look.
I added a test case for this (see commit above). I was unable to reproduce the behavior you are describing on netcore5
. I'll run it on other platforms. Can you modify the test case to fail in 6.3.5?
Interesting - this fails in net451
based builds but not netcore5
based builds.
Found the missing cast. This is fixed in 6.3.6 available now.
Thanks! We'll give it a try on Monday!
Seems to have fixed the issue we were seeing. Thanks for the quick turnaround!
Describe the bug
We've got a few stored procedures that take TVPs where at least one of the columns is a GUID. When those procedures are called by Insight they throw an exception stating "Operation could destabilize the runtime".
Steps to reproduce
InsightTvpCrashRepro.zip
In the attached zip file, execute the sql file to setup a database with a single table with three entries, a custom table-type with a single GUID column, and a stored procedure that uses the custom type.
The included sample program crashes as soon as it attempts to execute the stored procedure.
Note: when I changed the custom type to use an
nvarchar(1)
instead of auniqueidentifier
and usedA
,B
, andC
forTableEntry
inSampleTable
the query executes successfully.Expected behavior
The query should execute successfully.