Closed HTRLo closed 7 years ago
Could you upload a part of your signal (.complex) so we can investigate?
Her is a capture of the signal.
Had to rename the zip file to PDF for GitHub to accept it. Just rename it back to .zip after download.
Thanks for the sample signal! We will have a look at GFSK demodulation support.
Hi @HTRLo ,
I played around a bit more with your signal and found out, that there is a kind of quantization error. What I did, was to put a average filter on the signal giving me this: Does this look okay for you? I believe that URH can live without explicit GFSK demodulation support, as you can demodulate a GFSK signal by tuning the parameters in FSK demodulation as I did in the screenshot. However, I might be mistaken here! Here is the averaged signal for reference: averaged.pdf (rename to .complex after download)
If this works for you, we should think about integrating an average filter into Interpretation phase.
Ahh.. There is the signal ;) Tried on some other samples also, looks real promising. After some playing around i found out that 2 short pulses= binary 0 and 1 long pulse is binary 1. Now i need to try to regenerate the signal with my own bit stream to try some packet injection.
Hi. I have used URH for some projects lately and the tool makes it easy to play with unknown protocols, great work! On my latest adventure in the RF world i need to tackle a GFSK signal. Is it possible to get GFSK as a modulation in UHR? I see that it is implemented in generator part of the SW, but not in the interpretation. Added a cutout of my troublesome signal for reference.
Regards Håkon