search

jordansissel / fpm

Effing package management! Build packages for multiple platforms (deb, rpm, etc) with great ease and sanity.
http://fpm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Other
11.13k stars 1.07k forks source link

Build rpms without requiring rpmbuild #54

Open jordansissel opened 13 years ago

jordansissel commented 13 years ago

rpmbuild isn't available on some systems without going through pains to install it manually.

The RPM format is poorly documented, but in general, it should be doable to generate RPMs directly from ruby instead of rpmbuild. This would also let me avoid any workarounds I might require to use rpmbuild.

jneen commented 13 years ago

+1. It would be awesome for people to be able to build all sorts of packages in one go, on the same box.

jordansissel commented 13 years ago

Exactly. I already generate .deb files without the help of any debian tools. rpm's internal format is some serious bullshit, but I made headway a few weeks ago (see lib/rpm/ in the fpm source tree).

howardjones commented 13 years ago

Or at least document that it requires rpmbuild :-) The docs don't appear to mention external dependencies at all...

(but +1 for being able to build rpm and deb on anything!)

ankurcha commented 11 years ago

Any update on this?

jordansissel commented 11 years ago

Not yet, I haven't had energy yet to implement the 'write an rpm file' library in Ruby.

ankurcha commented 11 years ago

Is this something I can help with? I have some spare cycles that I can give.

If you have any notes or something I can give it a whirl.

jordansissel commented 11 years ago

The ruby library I wrote "arr-pm" implements reading an RPM. It needs write support (which should include setting any property in the rpm, adding files, signing, etc)

http://github.com/jordansissel/ruby-arr-pm

kevinkjt2000 commented 6 years ago

This is the one thing keeping me from using fpm for rpm creation. Adding the pure ruby capability of writing rpm files would be exactly in line with the first bit of the README.

  • If fpm is not helping you make packages easily, then there is a bug in fpm.
  • If you are having a bad time with fpm, then there is a bug in fpm.

Should this issue be labeled with bug?

jordansissel commented 6 years ago

@kevinkjt2000 I don't make much strong use of github issue labels in this project. If it comforts you, I can add a bug label.

This is the one thing keeping me from using fpm for rpm creation

Can you describe your situation more? What about rpmbuild prevents you from using it?

kevinkjt2000 commented 6 years ago

Can you describe your situation more? What about rpmbuild prevents you from using it?

Sure thing :smile:

rpmbuild isn't available on some systems without going through pains to install it manually.

jarondl commented 5 years ago

It does not handle most metadata yet (significantly package requirements), but if all you want is to put files in an rpm, you may consider rpmpack (tar2rpm), written in golang without calling rpmbuild. https://github.com/google/rpmpack