Closed jorgepiloto closed 3 years ago
Let us wait till the documentation is built. There, we could check the new performance comparison results. Gauss' solver should have more realistic values now 🤞🏽
Merging #49 (be3a3a7) into main (ba8f3f9) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #49 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.38% 90.38%
=======================================
Files 19 19
Lines 1259 1259
Branches 182 182
=======================================
Hits 1138 1138
Misses 70 70
Partials 51 51
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/lamberthub/plotting/iterations.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/lamberthub/plotting/time.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba8f3f9...be3a3a7. Read the comment docs.
The new values for both Gauss and Vallado are more realistic and according to the color scale! Merging this 🚀
This PR solves for #48 by ignoring points which did not converge.