Closed kumaravel95 closed 2 years ago
https://jsfiddle.net/ is handled in showing ads in nice way.
This repository is for the jsoneditor, not the website, so this issue seems to be a bit off-topic. *Correct me if I'm wrong
@Moulde, I understood you. Ads display component source code are may not be available in this repo. but I hope, jsoneditoronline.org is owned by @josdejong. I gave the suggestions for the website as per his information in the website.
So, I don't think, its off-topic
Thanks for your input Kumaravel, this is an interesting topic. This is indeed the best place with feedbacks about JSONEditorOnline (since there is no other place).
I find it difficult to do "right". Currently the served ads have a fixed with of 300px. Whether this is "large" depends on your screen resolution of course. Most of the users do have a high screen resolution for which 300px is fine, but for smaller screen resolutions I agree it is not ideal. For a long time I had a toggle to show 160px ads on screens with a width smaller than 1500px. This turned out to be tricky: when accidentally rendering an 300px ad in a space of 160px, you see only part of the ad, and these kind of violations can get you blacklisted by Google Ads very easily. I think it's a good idea though to have another look at this, it would be more user friendly for the people with a small screen.
As for the ad contents: I chose to not allow sensitive categories, and no movies, no popups, etc. I try to keep it decent.
For me personally, I would love to not have ads on the websites I visit, and instead pay a few bucks (like https://scroll.com/). Still, the easiest way to earn some money on the web is with ads, and I try to get some compensation too for the effort I put in this web application and I have to pay hosting costs somehow. I'm thinking about offering a paid, ad-free version of the web application. What do you think about that?
If https://jsoneditoronline.org would be your website, how would you go about this?
I understood the reason for increasing the pixel size to 300px and of-course ads will help to pay at-least hosting costs.
But If you see the statistics, only 22% of users users uses higher resolution worldwide and we should consider to reduce the ads size.
If it is my website, I will try below options,
Thanks for your inputs.
The average user of JSONEditor Online (typically developers) does have a relatively higher screen resolution, the google analytics of the website shows about 32% of the users have a screen resolution below 1500px (and about 8% of those are very close to the threshold), and more than 58% do have a resolution above it (and the remaining percentages is "other" so could be both). We have to be cautious with conclusions about those stats and generic stats from statcounter: in case of statcounter there is a huge category of "other" which is is about 1/3rd of all... (try if the stats of your screenshot add up to 100% 😉 ). Also it, depends quite a bit how you define "high resolution" (I was counting with 1500px or more, but you're using a higher value I suppose? 1920px?).
Anyway, it's a very good point to see again if I can show 160px ads again on smaller screens 👍
Edit: there you go... I took wrong stats from Google Analytics in the first place, update the numbers now. Stats are hard 😉
Thanks for considering it :)
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 10:39 PM Jos de Jong notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for your inputs.
The average user of JSONEditor Online (typically developers) does have a relatively higher screen resolution, the google analytics of the website shows about 34% of the users have a screen resolution below 1500px (and about 10% of those are very close to the threshold), and more than 50% do have a resolution above it (and the remaining percentages is "other" so could be both). We have to be cautious with conclusions about those stats and generic stats from statcounter: in case of statcounter there is a huge category of "other" which is is about 1/3rd of all... (try if the stats of your screenshot add up to 100% 😉 ). Also it, depends quite a bit how you define "high resolution" (I was counting with 1500px or more, but you're using a higher value I suppose? 1920px?).
Anyway, it's a very good point to see again if I can show 160px ads again on smaller screens 👍
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/josdejong/jsoneditor/issues/1251#issuecomment-788114907, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHUO6H24SCLGOV4IUCDBTTTBPC5HANCNFSM4YCDSWOA .
JSONEditor Online will now show smaller ads for screens below 1580px. It can happen that a half visible large ad is rendered on small screens on, this will be resolved by the ad provider soon.
Website looks better with my screen now.
👍
@josdejong
Now again, ads pane is got larger size for small screens when compared to previous one.
also non-technical ads also displaying now
That is interesting. Nothing changed since a year ago, where I changed the dynamic ad size to:
JSONEditor Online will now show smaller ads for screens below 1580px.
So in short:
Looking at your screenshots now in more detail, I think you have a regular full HD screen with a width of 1920px, which will indeed show ads of 300px. That makes me wonder how you managed to make this screenshot here: https://github.com/josdejong/jsoneditor/issues/1251#issuecomment-797878270 🤔
Anyway, is the width on your screen an actual problem? I mean, there is plenty enough space to show the JSON contents in the two editor panels I think? (I often have a regular full HD screen too).
also non-technical ads also displaying now
That is possible. There should be no ads though of sensitive categories like gambling, dating, pharmacy, etc.
Other question @kumaravel95: I have plans to introduce a subscription model for JSON Editor Online, maybe somewhere coming summer. That would give you an ad-free version of the application, and allow you to login and save your JSON documents privately in the cloud, and maybe share them within a team or so. Would such a subscription model be of interest to you?
Closing due to lack of response. Feel free to re-open if needed